Evaluate Weigh the pros and cons of technologies, products and projects you are considering.

Why should I choose a converged vs. hyper-converged system?

Converged and hyper-converged systems both include storage, networking and compute in one package, but converged systems can offer users some additional advantages.

The reason to choose a converged vs. hyper-converged system boils down to a single word: flexibility. Converged...

and hyper-converged systems are designed to make server virtualization easier to implement by taking the guesswork out of hardware selection. The idea is that a converged or hyper-converged system provides a set of matched hardware components that includes storage, networking and compute.

Converged systems use a hardware-based approach to virtualization. In other words, the compute, networking and storage components are all hardware-based and act as building blocks of the converged system. In contrast, hyper-converged systems use a software-defined infrastructure on top of physical components. This is an important distinction because it means converged systems are much more flexible.

Although components in a converged system are designed to work together to accomplish a common goal, there is no rule that requires the hardware to be used that way. If you want to use a compute module for a different purpose, you can do so. In a hyper-converged infrastructure, however, the software makes the rules and you cannot use components in an individual manner.

Another advantage to using a converged vs. hyper-converged infrastructure is that in some cases you may not have to purchase a large unit consisting of matched components. It may be possible to use a reference architecture approach, which allows an organization to use existing or new hardware to build the equivalent of a pre-built converged system. EMC, for example, offers a reference architecture with EVO: RAIL .

Regardless of whether it uses a building block or reference architecture approach, converged systems are usually less expensive than comparably equipped hyper-converged systems because of the cost associated with the required software. Some vendors argue that while startup costs are usually higher, hyper-converged systems are less expensive in the long run due to lower maintenance costs.

Next Steps

Running storage services in a converged architecture

Could converged storage systems mean the end of best-of-breed offerings?

Hyper-converged storage products offer more differentiation

Hyper-converged offerings provide modernization at a low cost

This was last published in July 2015

Dig Deeper on Converged Infrastructure Management



Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Join the conversation


Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Does a converged or hyper-converged system work better for your storage environment?
Nutanix employee here. Interesting perspective. I'd like to hear more about how a hardware-based approach to virtualization is "much more flexible" that a software-based approach.