.NEXT up for Nutanix storage: Bare metal, containers, cloud

At its .NEXT user conference in Las Vegas, hyper-convergence leader Nutanix adds storage for bare metal databases and persistent storage for containers.

LAS VEGAS – Instead of rolling out any new products at its user conference, Nutanix is concentrating on building...

out its current platform.

The hyper-convergence pioneer is moving beyond storage for virtual machines with new support for block storage on bare metal servers and persistent storage for containers. It is also adding the ability to self-provision and manage resources for public clouds.

The new Nutanix storage features were annoucned today on the opening day of its .NEXT user conference.

The Nutanix Xtreme Computing Platform is a hyper-converged platform combining compute, storage and virtualization in one chassis. But as the hyper-converged market gets crowded with large vendors such as EMC, Cisco, VMware and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) entering the market, Nutanix is looking to broaden its software stack. A year ago at .NEXT, Nutanix introduced its Acropolis data fabric that included a native hypervisor called Acropolis hypervisor (AHV). It added file services, analytics and predictive modeling in February.

New features for Nutanix storage platform

With today's new features, Nutanix now supports storage for VMware virtual machines, blocks, files and persistent storage for containers.

"We're becoming the enterprise cloud platform," said Suda Srinivasan, Nutanix director of product marketing. "We have an infrastructure solution that supports all enterprise workloads and delivers a cloud-like experience in the data center. We started out with hyper-convergence that provides compute and storage, and last year we added built-in virtualization."

Acropolis Block Services (ABS) and Acropolis Container Services (ACS) are part of the 4.7 release of the Nutanix operating system due in July. ABS allows Nutanix storage customers to store information on databases running on bare metal Cisco, Dell and HPE servers. It exposes block storage as an iSCSI mount to access as if it were on a SAN. 

"Some customers have block storage on workloads that may need to run on bare metal," Srinivasan said. "It might be a transitional plan where you want a bridge to hyper-converged, or, for licensing reasons, you might want to keep them on physical servers."

ACS provides persistent storage for containerized applications such as Docker and other microservices. That allows developers to run virtualization and containers on the same Nutanix storage platform.

At .NEXT, Nutanix also previewed self-service capabilities for provisioning and managing storage and applications on private clouds, and the addition of scenario-based modeling for what-if analysis before customers make changes to their infrastructure. Nutanix is expected to add those features in late 2016, along with OpenStack drivers.

On the hardware side, Nutanix will make all-flash nodes available for all of its hardware models in August. Currently, only the NX-9000 supports all flash.

Is cloud the .NEXT thing for Nutanix storage services?

Eric Slack, senior analyst at the Evaluator Group IT analyst firm, said Nutanix doesn't need a shiny new product at .NEXT because it already has a wide range of hardware models and a lead in the hyper-converged technology race.

"They're doing a lot of little things," he said. "They keep adding features and support for different platforms. I think they have the strongest feature set of the hyper-converged players."

But Slack said it might be a stretch for Nutanix to position itself as an enterprise cloud platform. "I have to give them credit for trying that," he said. "Is it a scalable elastic architecture? I don't think you'll see a lot of hyperscale customers using it."

Not everyone agrees with that assessment. Arun Taneja, president of the Taneja Group consulting firm, said Nutanix's core technologies provide the building blocks for cloud.

"If you want to build an Amazon or Azure cloud in the enterprise, this is the way to go. You're not going to do it with EMC," Taneja said. "Nutanix originally thought of hyper-convergence as infrastructure replacement because it would be a new way of doing things. Now they're executing on that broader theme."

Dig Deeper on Hyper-Converged Vendors and Products

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Join the conversation

4 comments

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

What do you think it will take for Nutanix to be seen as an enterprise cloud platform?
Cancel
Full disclosure. I'm an EMCer who's closely involved with ScaleIO, EMC's hyperconverged/hyperscalable SDS platform for both raw capacity, performance and Enterprise IT 'core' mission critical apps -- including private and public cloud services.  Regardless, I don't think Nutanix is quite "there yet" in terms of meeting Enterprise IT expectations, requirements and use cases.  Why?  
Read blog at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hyperconvergedsensitive-nutanix-storage-platforms-ready-burkley?trk=mp-reader-card

In particular, many in our storage industry wonder why Nutanix is allegedly so loathe to produce or submit to neutral, independent 3rd party performance tests and evals.  Or why they are losing so MUCH money quarterly....or why a Nutanix cluster is unstable and unpredictable under intense, heavy workloads and apps.   I don't want to rain on Nutanix's party this week at Vegas, but these are legitimate questions/concerns.  Perhaps Nutanix can enlighten me/us all...and be more open by providing credible, industry standard and accepted product eval/performance testing data. Enterprise customers need that.  They deserve that.  Marketspeak is not enough.  Until then, a Nutanix solution for the Enterprise market is suspect IMHO/FWIW.
Cancel
Why would Nutanix want to go head to head as a platform play?
Cancel
It does seem odd, doesn't it? Companies that pick major vendors like that don't necessarily do it because the major vendors' products are all that much better, but because they have some assurance the company will be around for a while and can offer the services and support they need. Is Nutanix up for that?
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchDataCenter

SearchCloudStorage

SearchStorage

SearchNetworking

SearchVMware

Close