It isn't entirely fair to compare the expense of a SAN or NAS system to that of a hyper-converged system because...
the three technologies were created for different purposes. In addition, there is no fixed price associated with any of the three. Costs depend on a number of factors, such as the amount of storage purchased and the scale of the deployment. There are also low- and high-end offerings for each technology. NAS systems, for example, are generally considered to be the least expensive of the three, but a high-end NAS system could cost as much as a low-end hyper-converged system.
Another thing to consider is that you are paying primarily for storage when you purchase a SAN or NAS system. Sure, there are other components such as networking hardware that must be purchased, but the bulk of the cost is directly attributed to storage hardware. Hyper-converged systems comprise a number of different components, including compute, storage and networking. The compute components account for a significant portion of the overall cost. If you base your estimate solely on storage, you would find hyper-converged storage systems almost always have a higher cost per gigabyte simply because they contain more than just storage hardware.
A final consideration is functionality. In the case of SAN, NAS or even a converged storage system, the storage hardware can be used for any purpose. In the case of a hyper-converged system, all the components work together and cannot be used separately. A hyper-converged system would therefore be a good choice to build a virtualization infrastructure, but not to expand available data storage.
Users claim long-term cost benefits with hyper-converged storage
Steps for choosing a hyper-converged storage system
How the current hyper-converged market leaders compare
Dig Deeper on Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Management
Related Q&A from Brien Posey
Quad-level NAND has its benefits, but is it right for enterprise-level companies? While it can be plagued by performance and durability issues, the ... Continue Reading
Disaster recovery requirements are constantly changing, and a DR plan must do the same. Frequent testing and clear communication can go a long way ... Continue Reading
While cloud DR is gaining popularity, it may not be the right choice for every organization. On-premises DR often comes with more predictable pricing... Continue Reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.