agsandrew - Fotolia

Q
Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Why might you choose to forgo flash in hyper-converged storage?

Find out why and for what use cases and application workloads 100% solid-state flash may not be the best storage choice for hyper-converged infrastructure.

Spinning disk is dead! Long live spinning disk! It isn't unusual to read both of these headlines in the news nowadays. Of course, as flash prices plummet, it's increasingly common for companies to consider what flash -- either in a hybrid spinning disk-flash combination or in the form of all-flash systems -- might do for workloads, including for hyper-converged storage.

But is flash storage always necessary? Is it possible for companies to stick with the tried-and-true spinning disk in some or all cases?

The state of flash and hyper-converged storage

For a couple of years, NAND flash supply was tight, leading to price increases rather than the typical price plummet that accompanies an expanding technology. Since early to mid-2018, though, supplies have loosened, which has led to NAND flash price drops.

Lower prices are relative, however. SSDs on a per-gigabyte basis are still vastly more expensive than their HDD cousins. For example, only six months ago, around the time of the annual Flash Memory Summit, a Wells Fargo analyst noted how enterprise SSDs stood at about a three to four times dollar-per-gigabyte premium compared to mission-critical HDDs, while SSDs were at about a 15 to 17 times dollar-per-gigabyte premium compared to nearline, high-capacity HDDs for the enterprise.

That's still a hefty delta, and even though workloads might like it, not all workloads demand all-flash. So, the question is: If you're considering hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI), why might you consider an all-disk configuration?

Capacity vs. performance

The answer is easy: Consider all-disk over all-flash or hybrid flash for hyper-converged storage and HCI platforms when you value capacity over performance to a sufficient extent. That line is incredibly subjective, of course, and will vary based on a number of factors. These include an organization's tolerance for additional costs to ensure application performance and the application mix that is being supported by the hyper-converged storage platform.

If you're operating an application that is especially write-heavy, you may need to consider flash, at least in a hybrid way. But, again, it depends on the sustained write needs of the application. Analyze each of the applications you intend to run in the environment to determine what's needed.

This was last published in March 2019

Dig Deeper on Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Systems

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

Please create a username to comment.

What types of applications is your organization running that might not need all-flash in a hyper-converged infrastructure platform?
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchDataCenter

SearchStorage

SearchNetworking

SearchVMware

Close